A Growing Problem..

Industrial espionage or corporate espionage is espionage conducted for commercial purposes instead of national security purposes.

The term is distinct from legal and ethical activities such as examining corporate publications, websites, patent filings, and the like to determine the activities of a corporation (this is normally referred to as competitive intelligence). Theoretically the difference between espionage and legal information gathering is clear. In practice, it is quite difficult to sometimes tell the difference between legal and illegal methods. Especially if one starts to consider the ethical side of information gathering, the border becomes even more blurred and elusive of definition.

Industrial espionage describes activities such as theft of trade secrets, bribery, blackmail, and technological surveillance. As well as spying on commercial organizations, governments can also be targets of commercial espionage—for example, to determine the terms of a tender for a government contract so that another tenderer can underbid.

Industrial espionage is most commonly associated with technology-heavy industries, particularly the computer and automobile sectors.

Espionage takes place in many forms. In short, the purpose of espionage is to gather knowledge about (an) organization(s). A spy may be hired, or may work for oneself.

 

 

Attorney plans to report on investigations

July 9th, 2009 Investigations into allegations against City of Gaylord officials are complete and City Attorney Donald Lannoye will report on the findings at the July 15th City Council meeting.

An initial investigation was ordered a few months ago when Gaylord Police Chief Dale Roiger was charged for allegedly planting a “bug” in the Chamber of Commerce office in 2007. He reportedly “bugged” the office in attempt to catch City Council members violating the Open Meeting Law.

Roiger is facing criminal charges for illegal interception of communications and misconduct of a public officer or employee. A court hearing for Roiger is scheduled for Tuesday, July 21st in Le Sueur County.

There is also an investigation into the conduct of Gaylord Police Officer Tom Webster who admitted to planting the digital recording device (bug) in the Chamber office. Webster initially denied any involvement, but eventually said he placed the device and was only following an order by Chief Roiger.

Both Roiger and Webster are currently on paid administrative leave. According to City Attorney Donald Lannoye, this course of action is taken to protect the City in case there would be an incident involving the Chief and officer during the investigations. Lannoye said placing Roiger and Webster on paid administrative leave is done so from a liability standpoint, especially when the officer’s credibility is in question.

A third investigation was ordered to determine whether or not the City Council was violating the Open Meeting Law. That investigation was ordered in late May.

According to Lannoye, the investigations were done by Renville and Scott County officials. It was done at no cost to the City because of a reciprocity agreement between Counties.

The Online Edition of The Gaylord Hub July 9, 2009